There have been some objections to the fee, as well as some problems in accepting monies in a larger amount. Reid On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Justin Krejci <JKrejci@usinternet.com> wrote:
Has there been any serious push to institute a fee associated with connecting to MICE? If not, can it be put on the agenda for the board to sort out/implement? If not, can we do a referendum? (too lazy ATM to read if by-laws even allow a referendum) <sarcasm> If not, well it's been good while it lasted </sarcasm>
I think MICE revenue generation (pre or post acquisition of IRS non-profit status) should be top priority at this point in time.
________________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Mike Horwath [drechsau@GEEKS.ORG] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:11 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Googling on IPv6 and HE to 20G
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:08:02AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
Virtual Chassis backplane is only 128Gbps (2x64Gbps), which seems like alot, but given how much of traffic the exchange is doing,> could quickly become an oversubscribed bottleneck.
Or just move to 4550's at $9K each + cables for 256Gbps (2x128Gbps) stacking, and even add in the QSFP module for 40Gbps additional capacity.
This is all resolvable with money - money from port fees would have covered this.
Poking the dead-horse that really is alive and kicking.
Leading from behind! I am Hindmost, back-seat driver, and overall captain obvious..
-- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
-- Reid Fishler Director Hurricane Electric +1-510-580-4178