Has there been any serious push to institute a fee associated with connecting to MICE? If not, can it be put on the agenda for the board to sort out/implement? If not, can we do a referendum? (too lazy ATM to read if by-laws even allow a referendum) <sarcasm> If not, well it's been good while it lasted </sarcasm> I think MICE revenue generation (pre or post acquisition of IRS non-profit status) should be top priority at this point in time. ________________________________________ From: MICE Discuss [MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET] on behalf of Mike Horwath [drechsau@GEEKS.ORG] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2014 2:11 PM To: MICE-DISCUSS@LISTS.IPHOUSE.NET Subject: Re: [MICE-DISCUSS] Googling on IPv6 and HE to 20G On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:08:02AM -0600, Andrew Hoyos wrote:
Virtual Chassis backplane is only 128Gbps (2x64Gbps), which seems like alot, but given how much of traffic the exchange is doing,> could quickly become an oversubscribed bottleneck.
Or just move to 4550's at $9K each + cables for 256Gbps (2x128Gbps) stacking, and even add in the QSFP module for 40Gbps additional capacity. This is all resolvable with money - money from port fees would have covered this. Poking the dead-horse that really is alive and kicking. Leading from behind! I am Hindmost, back-seat driver, and overall captain obvious.. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG