21 Aug
2019
21 Aug
'19
2:04 a.m.
On 8/20/19 8:48 PM, Darin Steffl wrote:
Is there any policy in place for peers that let their ports saturate at 100% for an extended period of time? DCN looks like they could use an upgrade to their 10G port and not sure if anyone proactively reaches out to members when saturation occurs.
I've forwarded your message to DCN. For remote switch ports, we have a policy of requiring upgrades before saturation. For regular participants, I'm not sure that we have a policy. I'm also not sure if we want a policy there, as that might be considered dictating peering policy. I'm not personally opposed, but this is something that would need some thought. -- Richard